Posts Tagged ‘reykjavik’

tower – a place of brutal exposure and incomparable vistas

April 23rd, 2011 | Richard Almond

The termination of a route, the tower sits as a pin in the open water. Wind roars through its permeable facades, icy waters lash at those visitors who dare to scale it. This is enclosure in the faintest sense of the word, one must truly experience the raw power of Iceland’s elements to reap the reward of glorious views.

transient enclosures

April 22nd, 2011 | Richard Almond

Ebbing tides brush mesh against one another, animating juxtaposing static and floating elements. The optical effect reminds one of the kinetic nature of the academy, continuously in flux, never static.

testing materiality

April 14th, 2011 | Richard Almond

Thinking about the material quality of the academy, I began to experiment with a range of metals. Click here for more images.

In relation to previous posts, facade treatment will use areas of mesh to allow visitors to experience the elements whilst retaining a sense of enclosure. The materials above are ultra-fine stainless steel mesh, fine copper mesh, medium brass mesh and a coarse steel mesh. I also experimented with some sheet brass. Taking inspiration from the Reykjavik vernacular, I have extracted a number of key elements common to many of 101′s buildings, and used them to devise a treatment I feel is both respectful to a unique city and practical for a floating building.

 

Light and Transparency

One of the qualities of mesh is its seemingly multi-dimensionality. Viewed front-on, a mesh may appear almost completely transparent, yet when viewed from an acute angle, the same mesh may appear as an almost solid object. The way in which light reflects from a mesh facade is similarly dynamic, as seen from the comparative images below, the angle from which the sunlight hits the material has a dramatic effect upon its appearance and how it is read.

 

Water Retention

The building’s facade will of course be constantly exposed to sea water and rain. The perforated nature of mesh means it may hold droplets of water. A very fine mesh acts in a way similar to a piece of cloth, allowing light to penetrate through whilst water simply runs off (left image below). A more coarse gauge of mesh (right image below) will retain much of the water within its perforations. Over-laying differing gauges of mesh creates further unique interactions between facade and water.

 

Erosion and Weathering

The prospect of metal cladding being in constant contact with sea water poses both a problem and an opportunity. The static components of the building will see Reykjavik’s huge 5m tidal range engulf much of the facade, the movement of salt water across the surface of the metal is likely to cause some chemical response, generating a prominent band of effected material. The floating elements of the building will still encounter constant lapping from the sea, the winds will drive spray through mesh facades and across decks. Although renowned for being one of the cleanest cities in Europe, acid rain does exist in Reykjavik, and this is something that would have a definite effect upon a metal facade. Below are examples of brass sheets exposed to acid, which can very quickly strip the sheen from the material. The left image has been pre-treated with wax in sections to mask the acid, creating an attractive aesthetic.

layers of enclosure

April 13th, 2011 | Richard Almond

Rather than a solid facade differentiating between inside and outside, the transition is eroded. A series of meshes mediate gradually between a sealed inner box and the world beyond, offering inhabitants intermittent glimpses of the elements. The connection to the water and the landscape is heightened, visitors experience a gusting wind, splashing waves and the sounds and smells of a working harbour as they move through the building. There is, however, a sense of enclosure and protection, a suitable level of containment which allows users a sense of safety whilst they inhabit a series of floating platforms in constant motion.

site un-adjustment

April 3rd, 2011 | Richard Almond

The issue of site has continued to crop up since I decided to move piers a few months back. Most recently in my penultimate review, critics felt unanimously that my site should be the more westerly pier on which I originally chose to work. Many of the reasons for which I decided to switch to Ingólfsgarður have proven to become somewhat redundant as the project has progressed, and therefore I am deciding to re-adjust back to my previous site.

Of course the beauty of a floating building is that it can simply be towed across the water, the move itself will require only minimal redesigning of the building and so will still be feasible at this late stage. The issue of access to the site across a public square will have to be considered, yet I do feel the problem could be solved elegantly. For a project aiming to extend the public realm into the water, it seems logical for its siting just off a public square, and completely illogical for it to be hidden away behind the most prominent building in Reykjavik. The issue of access to open water for the boats will be aided through cutting back Ingólfsgarður to a size more akin to the planned smaller marina piers along the southern edge of the harbour. All in all this is the correct decision and one I feel very confident about.

kinetics, texture and geometry

March 28th, 2011 | Richard Almond

elevational studies

March 19th, 2011 | Richard Almond

Elevational studies of the various components of the academy. Testing roof pitches and facade colouration in a play on Reykjavik’s vernacular.

considering spaces

March 16th, 2011 | Richard Almond

Its about time I began to think about some of the spaces of my building in more detail. Most interesting for me are the semi-outdoor spaces which allow direct access from the building to the water. These areas must provide some sense of enclosure to prevent visitors from falling into the sea, yet I am insistent that any facade should still allow an experience of the elements. The mediation between outdoor and indoor space will be a gradual one, incrementally enclosing inhabitants.

permanence and impermanence

March 2nd, 2011 | Richard Almond

There has been a nagging issue concerning the permanence of my building. A building which floats can feel temporary, a building which both floats and moves laterally, without definition, is effectively a poorly-designed boat. My pontoons were in danger of becoming too fleeting, too loose to constitute architecture. A datum was required, something solid from which the movement of the rest of the building could be read.

The tower becomes the pin which holds the building together, the culmination of a pedestrian’s journey. A suspended ribbon sits just above the water, connecting the tower to the harbour-side, acting as walkway and servicing element for the floating pontoons which dock onto it.

constructional model

February 23rd, 2011 | Richard Almond

This model attempts to expore technical and constructional properties for a typical section through the academy. More images can be found here.